No. 21-7563

Alexander Kates v. New York

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure custody-determination district-court-discretion due-process federal-precedent habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance standing state-law state-law-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are district courts allowed to disregard State law and controlling federal precedent when handling state habeas corpus petitions?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ? . 1. Are district courts allowed to disregard State law and controlling federal . precedent when handling state habeas. corpus petitions? 2. Is a petitioner "in custody" for purposes of habeas corpus if a sentence for a parole violation runs consecutive to that of a new conviction? 3. May a district court analyze an actual innocence claim using its own standard rather than the one established by the Supreme Court? 4. Does it constitute ineffective assistance of counsel when an attorney in a criminal case does absolutely nothing except appear at court dates? j

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2022-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Alexander Kates
Alexander Kates — Petitioner
Alexander Kates — Petitioner
New York
Jodi Ann DanzigOffice of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent
Jodi Ann DanzigOffice of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent