Whether the unconstitutionally vague language, struck down by the Court in 185 OG, violates 35 USC 112(b)

No question identified. : OUESTIONS) FRESENTEQ C1) Goes the Unconstitetionally Vapue language, Strack down. by the Court ine 185 OG), poly te 1SUSC F22¢gyG) ia Co » . (2) May a Stipulation SulFice Te Convey feolere.| Aerisclictior Wher the Geoverniment ils te Irovi de. the. Cert Freate, Te frove. . The federally ‘nsured Status. AS required. by [BASC 211 3a) and I G ) ace Hhe. Sixth Amendment and the bocerteenth Amendment . Guarantee et; troner the. right B® aveid J ampriSormen? ender Uncons iit tional (Procedures. P CY ) Moy Hhe. Government Consistent with the Fourth Amendirnent . Ut lize (h loranat ore esally Seized From a Fi Vex. Te. celf Shove. , i Wi thoef a Court order ?