Miguel Scott Arnold v. United States
JusticiabilityDoctri
allowable-unit-of-prosecution-for-18-usc-1591(a)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.] What is the allowable unit of prosecution for violations. of 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)? , | 2.) Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals err by not remanding to the lower court with an order for the District Court to dismiss petitioner's , indictment due to the Jurysnottbeing instructed to specifically find, if any, what victim the jury believed met the burden? 3.] Because of the complexity of petitioner's case/charge(s), should the lower courts had tasked the jury to find/been given instructions to find petitioner guilty of each individual victim the jury believed met the burden? 4.] Due to the allowable unit of prosecution, not being established, nor firmly understood by any of the lower courts in regards to 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a), and being that this Honorable Court had/has not yet defined , or established such, should the "Rule of Lenity'' be/have been applied to petitioner as this Honorable Court has in . similar