Taqwa Siddeeq v. DeKalb County, Georgia
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Does due process exist under the Loudermill standard when government counsel withholds the employee's written response?
Questions Presented for Review Question 1: Does due process for terminated employee } exist under the Loudermill standard when government counsel withholds from the court record | the employee’s written response to the employer's | intent to terminate letter, and the written response | is unavailable on the record? | Under 24 CFR 92.356(b), does the statutory restrictions applicable to a job position’s tenure covered under this statute extend to a subsequent job | position’s tenure when such position is not covered | under this statute, and when a period of | unemployment separates the two position tenures? Question 3: Under 24 CFR 92.356(b), does any nonHOME related pre-existing financial interest constitute a conflict of interest for a covered person under the statute? | | | ne LIST OF INTERESTED PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. RELATED CASES Siddeeq v. DeKalb County, No. 1:17-cv-01327SCJ, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. Summary Judgment in | favor of DeKalb County was granted by the District Court on December 2, 2019. | Siddeeg v. DeKalb County, No. 20-10155-HH. On December 20, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court ruling. | | | | | Vv STATEMENT OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND