No. 21-7587
Jose Garcia Solorzano v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acceptance-of-responsibility appeal criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court district-court-discretion reduction-in-sentence sentence-reduction sentencing-guidelines u.s.s.g.-§3e1.1 u.s.s.g.-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court err in not granting Mr. Solorzano a reduction in sentence for his acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. §3E1.1?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the district court err in not granting Mr. Solorzano a reduction in sentence for his acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. §3E1.1 ? i PARTIES The caption of the case contains the names of all of the parties.
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Jose Garcia Solorzano
Amir Mohabbat — The Chicagoland & Suburban Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner
Amir Mohabbat — The Chicagoland & Suburban Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent