No. 21-7601
Eugene Kevin Pugh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether appellate court erred by concluding there was no error in denying appellant's motion to suppress on reversible error in overruling objections raised during the prosecution's closing argument
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | NWhether appelate court eared By coneluding thege was NO eRROR Iv Aemuywo APPel|AWy's motion Yo SuPPReSS on Reversible eeRoR im oveRUl ing | SoyerHions Aarsed down ne PROSERHON'S closing, ARQUMmeNt. a) Whether ApPElatE covet eaaed by Cowelydrvg, HheRe WAS WO ERROR WW) dens. \NO) repellanks mohon Assets WeFFechwe assistpee of RIM GOUNsE| AND AtOAl iwnorence oF the muRder oF michael Hglmone Goemse the citiine | SwePeRS Report supports Mirowees IwNocene, | Zz
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Eugene K. Pugh
Eugene K. Pugh — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent