No. 21-7608

Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process free-speech standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding that the Mandatory Vaccine Provision of the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : SlouiNions Qunsited 1. ih ust cual v Nesp 494.5. 100, od so, sod CA AB UNO), Sishe orgies, Bolt, coll a. Con iwduttanly oti we ito Ne wal lat alr ng age al a mga ico to say hig cajmpl nh so blig . \dicmabdrgedl el bomen ‘ ipods } crocus _\ Ved. hy, op. 0.) “the cout! » galscl Tes cond Gnd yur subwaieus ifouixe Soin se da ce te | 3. \dhathw ud enka (i oi Udhurts 55% 9.20 (fn in 20° sit nt gel et ibd a sig hn ea oh Wh ed viatid 0 Aida ued aldo , Mong ASA 0, wee, ao8 de 8.198 (1990) the. Neda ‘andtond) 16 WMATIGIION of vali, clue i sd apa i in iubhd vi a cnt" dao Ic. CDSS fs hoe uni sil a aad ¢ 5, \Whdthot urclor Dood v, Natit bao fcuue, ADL US, 209, 2247 iid | ins unatad (ctl) pid, ond ae sae ee nd anu a rnd, othe a exo ag puch sah boul ned hop a, ifsc dant 3 is re a iu on ba ‘aly Dat Hirolyld woos HALAL S200) o | | 8,195 dd. 95, 1A (2010) The Lvbdoads silitioea ction ot inetd sy su bet hom ca unusual but nnd ¢ + i ns Noddons’ Xv. lett Stal sesal in S949) (on bose) t sada, tions | saps) lowdin, oe dn sso nih cl aon Tries bo ee ones Hoyts, Ook Lowsal, A CG it We ©, \\atthen wodus owrony’, Cuno, SUL Wd 875 89%, U4 SU 6 Ui Hho x Coun a tind O44) the Mondoat Atte of Midhigan ond Vichigan Nepean) Comins PALO C S70¢tec, hon onda abl, "hess thy nes Fido) dota ld, pil an Sty Hg cop a idalits ¢ 9. \dhihon undo Catoson v.Londuy SSE FSA 24 b., conga Luks ly hd" ConiScatt-\ity anu} Oriol olla denon hay 8 pct) aay Oi WX | ib ti, Pdi, Low, uu, connor Hien When dl \unbey 220-0096 pod i aay 15,2008. : Tap che on vA ta Novenney ‘lai. is puny 05 e022 : Vax | | Sali cil, Lonsititiionad Od alloy Prowsions landed ee cece Be Cabal |The Or ence hoowonis tot Pai Se. ooo PAS 4 NG \p Landis fi Ordon the Wvahad Géhos cout of ea bt eee | BppandicL~ Yeon (be \itod halos const of opal Bong gab wWhooino, Os Woe, ils ed kt dnc pgond. Co Loni ) pnd Sola pots invoiced i ei a ae pig . | 4 | Vix Dil hidd y. Dah, 5809.1 AN (Ah Gn 2009) a yw Won v, Shows S889 24 At (5th tin 2004), ... 2 nee ewe Gti v Vombut, 3034.24 209 (2d Cin, 200A) nea neces ee | Conbonille v aay 142185 A an free v. Xiwaies, 102d loBloCiOph in KAD). ball Gl. Corp v Suonbly, spb saa (coo_ ow Ronit Mond as LM das(dlinzod) = billnan Mig hat Ui, St 4,34 FASANO) loyal). Nelloino v Hoshasd, 222 .dusp.2d BioldNe,2o0). Eoucnon v.Pondun, 5610.3. 28, 128.0 230, et. £9.24 S081 (7009) (ten owiaw)... Oooo ove tebe rebtpteep ee YA Expina) v. Hed, 556%24 138 (2d Un.cooW). BP Yoaron v, Ramon, StL .8.825, abe epg) is fay {uns 22 eee 29(etntin co). fod, VicXinws, 352. 4.84 582(2d Gi. 2008) AL Aca v jai 200 \-66986 (so, ayo fo) ee {ows v, hous A+ 1.8.58,90.0 SAHA poco) ne Alastor vy; O50 Fadsio(eth Gin, 2008) ee ‘Word v. Bhechon, 253 $24 Slo (Ah tin 2001). nee Wn iy Counc 2atsleh i200. ty {us v. Aotiy, 306 2d 265 Cts. MA). eB Vil ot x | Hudson v VeVi, SOSI.8 1, 112. 80-995 0802)... Hues v howe, AA.8, 5101.6 BBR) ae lion ud 2028 eno OD nao Romer V. \ hun, 202 4.Cipp. Alot Ln. 208) A Vichich v. 4 ome AAMC) On ty Veit Ube, BIE 42d MO ith G98) LL Vaal v. Colon, 828 92d FAD BAD Voy v. Bpsinghoin 545 4.20 AS Hh Ein. 2008) inf GAdassHhUnZeos pron) NB \\ v. Clow, 379 42d AL (th Gin 2004). i Chambon AS 9. 24 JosAlbth Gin 909). ) usa, 229% dap 2445S 2) le ih oe A Promo vse, 376% 6th Un. 2004), et hoy ve Lomo, 2008 ay 10M), ct «that Daler ao Bilin 208), Bhaliy vk 9 Oya 2d FAD Nia SR oo Bhd Ul eh rads ao) eee ee MD Avidh v.Voschun, 29.24 Mola). eB Shona v oid ad ana ah ay Ni, 45 U8 9,30. bok a5 6D... nia ity DN i vit bx “Siheu Vv. Ligh Cop, 844. 2d tAzalod fin 900). lo Oneal v. Visgan, 208°9.34 868 (8th Da. 2000) ee a nn fi ai 24 So(S.L. Gin 200). 4 Malin v, Nosput “PAA, 20, Od, 1078 108.84. 24128 960)... SERRE Sree ne ek eR SEA Rt eng gpk REAR RY Go ee ce eee WAAL AS \Nallun v. Beltivo, 2008 \l Her lig coe eel \dthans v. Addy SOWA. H, 20h Et 1195, 195. £4995 (2010) (pan ua. KX | abbot) | shal adn Vrulos.ch godt Vacs de 2B... ta NOE Naat OW. UD ABB... ccc . } | ok x dw tn a stout 1 pil og t

Docket Entries

2022-09-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-07-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2022)
2022-04-01
Application (21A564) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until June 4, 2022.
2022-03-25
Application (21A564) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 5, 2022 to June 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman — Petitioner