No. 21-7609
Desmond Deleon Carviel v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law career-offender-guideline district-court-discretion guideline-commentary inchoate-offenses judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a district court defer to the Sentencing Guideline commentary without first determining if the guideline is genuinely ambiguous
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) May a district court defer to the Sentencing Guideline commentary without first determining if the guideline is genuinely ambiguous. Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 $.Ct. 2400, 2415 (2109) (2) Does Application Note 1 for U.S.S.G. §4B1.2 of the Career Offender Guideline improperly include conspiracies and other inchoate offenses into the ambit of the guideline. ii
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2022)
Attorneys
Desmond Carviel
Harry E. White — Nickols & White, PLLC, Petitioner
Harry E. White — Nickols & White, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent