Stevie Wyre v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
HabeasCorpus
Whether Wype is entitled to relief on an evidentiary hearing
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1), Whether Wype is ewttlet Yo Relief 02 av Eviherhiney heain Whene Whe Lded Slates Coue of Appeals. SCaeut avd Whe VUrled Ques Dishdiel Couet Loe Whe Coulthood Dataet of Texas molated feceen\ Rights awd Wyle ght 4o Due Prees, hoy wuposing a SAwchoo, pAekug his Petition of Acdun! Tuwocence Accompawed by & Caw of Conefuhonal yYiolion, WERE Alewly chseoverss evidence is preserseat AS Clear aud ame evidence What is ero, Boenred Mronr Review avd ehers 2), Whether Wyre is entitled Yo rele? 02 ao Eviclevhinry haem, whee She "denier engaged mW muscouduet, ww A Brooke violation, by allowing peeyury teshmony from Une Shales vores, a presevtence wveshoa0o (Ps Report Ghet Conlrins false perjury _w9foua shor wnat Cooleadials and Cont eibuted Yo Vine Conwichod , Were Whe iluoducing of Some SWORD Slefemect Ghat Could uo! ioe cross-examwed at Yhe nending . 3), Whether Wyre is enttlel to Rehe? o2 Ao Evidenhany henesng, whee ine, ConQontelion Clause Requires Saat & che Radiat In A Cawnwal Case , be allowed +o impenth Vie credibility of a orosecubiod oes were Whe ceferdavt wes Denied “Due “Paoeess aqint sunrez Whe Ss" oy S eared i” Ameadmedks and Sedeaa Rignt, prelawing vo bis Crimuel Cowvichod Ghar is Bei Poor Lom Revieo aul zehel,