Whether the lower court erred in denying the petition for writ of certiorari

ISSUES PRESENTED 1. WHETHER OR NOT JUDGE McCLURE, OF THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AFTER EXAMINING PETITIONER'S APPEAL, ERRED WHEN HE DETERMINED HE WOULD GRANT P.D.R.; 2. WHETHER OR NOT THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14th AMENDMENT WAS BREACHED. WHEN THERE PATENTLY EXIST ; “INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE" TO ESTABLISH EVERY’ ELEMENT’ OF THE OFFENSE CHARGED; 3. WHETHER OR NOT THE 6th COURT OF APPEALS “DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF DUE PROCESS PROTECTION AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT FAILED TO "ABATE" APPEAL, AFTER BOTH STATE AND DEFENSE FILED A "JOINT MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL",. AFTER DISCOVERY OF "NEWLY AVAILABLE EVIDENCE” . OF EXCULPATORY DNA RESULTS, LINKING SOMEONE ELSE TO THE. OFFENSE; 4. WHETHER OR NOT PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF THE DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE -WHEN TRIAL COURT PERMITTED: INTO EVIDENCE THE TESTIMONY OF NON-CORROBORATED TESTIMONY OF | A JAILHOUSE SNITCH; : | 5. WHETHER OR NOT THE LOWER COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS } DISCRETION IN NOT DETERMINING THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATED | THE "CONFRONTATION CLAUSE" BY PERMITTING "HEARSAY" | TESTIMONY. . : | | | | | : | ii |