Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari on appealability

QUESTIONS PRESENTED } |. Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari on appealability. ll. Whether the district court should provide complete record on appeal (ROA) for } full, fair, and/or meaningful review. ltl, Whether summary dismissal before service based on affirmative defense, | which defendants have the burden of raising, is reversible as a matter of law. IV. Whether the Report and Recommendation (R&R) is nearly identical to the | former magistrate’s summary dismissal R&R in Beeson v. South Carolina (D. S.C. 2016). V. Whether the district court erred in failing to address governing State Law cited | in this case of complete diversity jurisdiction. VI. Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari regarding denial of the timely request for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article III judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters. | Vil. Whether denial of the substantial right of de novo determination by Article {il Judicial Officer without R&R on dispositive matters, hereafter coerced R&R, impermissibly denies/diminishes substantial rights including, but not limited to, Article Ill Judicial Officer, full and fair appeal rights, change in the standard of review regarding R&R, and/or diminished time to file appeal/objections for R&R without consent. | VIN. Whether this Court should grant writ of certiorari regarding the propriety of and/or lack of jurisdiction for referring to a magistrate a motion for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article III Judicial Officer without R&R on dispositive, or essentially dispositive, matters. | | ee ; |