Are the administrative internal court operation orders in response to the covid-19 pandemic an act that lacks authority, jurisdiction, due-process, a fraud-on-the-court, a content-and-viewpoint-discrimination manipulating public-debate about Covid-19 and therefore unconstitutional?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Chief Judge Wolfson of the district of New Jersey created administrative internal court operation orders in response to the covid-19 pandemic that were used to blanket all court cases with continuances. Continuance is defined as the suspension or postponement of a trial or court proceeding. Continuance is made on a case-by-case basis at the court’s discretion. Courts balance giving the moving party enough time: the need to make the trial timely and speedy; and the interests of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) also states a motion is required by the parties. The proper Due Process is motion procedure. There was no Due Process motion procedure. The orders were issued in other judge's cases, interfered with those other cases, ruled directly on the legality of other judge's cases, considered matters pertaining to cases assigned to other judges. The Covid-19 Administrative Internal Court Operation Orders acted like law aimed at the suppression of particular views to manipulate the public debate about the pandemic through coercion rather than persuasion. There is content and viewpoint discrimination from misrepresentations and propaganda from the CDC, the WHO, Dr. Fauci, political parties, and social media news that suppressed the Constitution. Are the administrative internal court operation orders in response to the covid-19 pandemic an act that lacks authority, jurisdiction, due process, a fraud on the court, a content and viewpoint discrimination manipulating public debate about Covid-19 and therefore unconstitutional? Page 2 of 36 CONTENTS CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED .8 JURISDICTION AND U.S. CONST. ARTICLE ITI STANDING .0cee LD PRECEDENTS THAT SUPPORT LACK OF AUTHORITY AND LACK OF JURISDICTION OF THE COVID -19 CONTINUANCE ORDERG. 12 Precedents on No Authority to Interfere Another Judge's Case .c::ccsc