No. 21-7639
Elizabeth Carley v. Dwight Neven, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law effective-assistance-of-counsel fourth-amendment search-and-seizure sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues and Sixth Amendment effective assistance of counsel issues were correctly interpreted, or contrary to well-established Federal and U.S. Supreme Court Law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED Whether the 1) Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues, AND 2) Sixth Amendment effective assistance of counsel issues Herein were correctly interpreted, OR contrary to well established Federal and U.S. Supreme Court Law.
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-22
Waiver of right of respondent Nevens, et al. to respond filed.
2022-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Nevens, et al.
Allison Lucille Herr — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent
Allison Lucille Herr — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent