No. 21-7641
Jose Diaz Perez v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-seizure intoxication-statements search-warrant
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the State of Texas and the U.S. District Court improperly admit evidence obtained unconstitutionally?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1) Did the State of Texas and the: U.S. District Court improperly hold that the trial court properly admitted into evidence a personal writing by the Petitioner, seized unconstitutionally upon the execution of an evidentiary search warrant? 2) Did the State of Texas and the U.S. District Court improperly hold that the trial court properly admitted into evidence statements made by Petitioner while he was intoxicated? ii CS re _ _ al a BO
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2022)
2022-02-09
Application (21A397) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 27, 2022.
2022-01-25
Application (21A397) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 26, 2022 to March 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.