No. 21-7643

Daniel Trejo v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-conviction criminal-law due-process duress fourth-district-court jury-instructions penal-code statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the statutory definition of duress under Penal Code Sections 26 and 288 is analogous

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Mv. Tresxo Ulac comictad tn Larde Part UPON : evidence made VP buthe VUickim mother cund mani ulated bu Wer My. Treso ~veseeck Wi pekitions this court Yow Sertibion Cortiovwart, to review o€ Khe on Publish decision of the fourth Oistick Covet OF AffealsS division two, affirming tresoS conviction ond Sentence, ArCoP of the court of Appeals 1> Attached aS Excbidh Are | Here isthe princi Pal 1SSue for review inValves Combeling lines 0€ court of Aepeals decisions avout Whe weaning of duss under fenalcode A6F 4 Reavion othe seid ana teal issue o€ sete Wide MPortonce im Pacts beth inotrukronal exvor claims Srocented Da Mc Wes. The staturoru deFinition oF duress under Penal ode. Section 26dand 288 is analogors. CReorle V Veale: (9.008) \b0 Cal, APP Uh Hob L Pen, Code 3988) +

Docket Entries

2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Daniel Trejo
Daniel Trejo — Petitioner