Mario Reynoso, aka Mario Hernandez v. United States
SocialSecurity Immigration
Remedy-for-CJA-attorney-failure-to-file-timely-cert-petition
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED yn . . . : . (1). WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER WHEN HIS COURTAPPOINTED (CJA) ATTORNEY FAILED TO INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE A TIMELY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN DEFIANCE OF ‘PETITIONER'S WRITTEN REQUEST THAT A FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT'S ADVERSE JUDGMENT BE CHALLENGED? (2). DOES A CJA COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY'S CONDUCT OF FAILING TO INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AFTER AN ADVERSE DECISION BY A FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS ON A CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEAL MATTER CONSTITUTE AN EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCE TO RECALL A MANDATE AND VACATE THE JUDGMENT ONLY TO REINSTATE THE JUDGMENT SO THAT A TIMELY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI CAN BE FILED ON THE ADVERSE JUDGMENT? AND IF SO, DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR WHEN IT DECLINED PETITIONER'S MOTION TO APPOINT CJA COUNSEL AND VACATE ITS JUNE 29, 2021, ADVERSE JUDGMENT, OF HIS CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEALS REVIEW AND ISSUE A NEW ORDER SO THAT NEWLY APPOINTED CJA COUNSEL CAN ASSIST PETITIONER WITH THE FILING OF A TIMELY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI? . (i) a Be