Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts may decline to enforce the plain language of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(a) requiring that a waiver of jury trial be in writing and accept an oral waiver in lieu of a written waiver
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether courts may decline to enforce the plain language of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(a) requiring that a waiver of jury trial be in writing and accept an oral waiver in lieu of a written waiver. Assuming arguendo that courts may rely on an oral colloquy, whether the oral colloquy must include — at least in the case of a defendant who is a foreign citizen, does not speak English, and has only a minimal foreign education — advice that the jurors will be drawn from the community and the defendant may participate in their selection. i
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-28
Reply of petitioner Luis Ceja filed. (Distributed)
2022-09-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-07-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 9, 2022.
2022-07-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 25, 2022 to September 9, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 25, 2022.
2022-06-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 23, 2022 to July 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-24
Response Requested. (Due June 23, 2022)
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2022)