Did the retaliatory transfer from one facility to another violate the petitioner's due process rights?

No question identified. : | a . QUESTION(S) PRE Question One? Did the reluliatory transfer Fre WO Opn le Seta in oP occ: inca i refer rie and dotuments Until] Sept. 24 2041, Lie be on Appel fs te Eighth Ciewit due He S ve Be cle a him te aut 4 vt due to He Stated direck intecerenee in bi ili ‘eels Gestion luo! Voes fe Pettinger Ubon bug a Series and Persistac AN . ; Series 5 (nes Yo Moi Jos dransterred \o catiother fecilit sepenle from Hal ob He Lalneses ive teens re iene =~ Cophinernent Ge te entire Hime and bus 1 Ul b, keko ceousttions & te Gury, Ca cot a Neel tete,eke. Weare Ye { epostions Frum Ye. copesite Gury, Oblein, counts pe co Medcel Tests, CC. ave. Necessary Prerequisites be Consider ty appointment S Course\ Questi on \hree: Did Hy USDC Dide Minnesca err in ils Use oP Summary Judamnent by (oling On Cose nok is entirely hased Of chat ig credibilily determinations Tak are bo Ya mathe by & Query ys ard insteod Culed mest favoruble to the Abring ody cother than the Mr Moving prrdy , ever uhen he precedent ot ths Court is hot “hes erposing parties belt tuo diffrent sforis,one oP Unit is bidust\y Contradicted by the reipds, 0 tha No TerSotmbe jacist thal believe Vt, & Court eheuld Nat cadogk Trad Versiun a He Raads for Mey & makien fic Sartmuey yap har Hoe, MADOL waited unl Gfhee Fs et discs tos Yo Kinully ertecrm Me tredical ess Naess ty Henuadkte Ae dag dane He Platts Si ip tages sagey POE