Whether the California Supreme Court erred when it denied petitioners' request for review on the summary denial of petitioners' writ of mandate and prohibition, and request for stay with the Court of Appeal, Appellate Division 3 without deciding the merits

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CQ) Whethee the California Supreme Couer enced When tT devied’ DeTITIONeRS “PeauEsT FOR Review On the SUMNIBAY, Talal OF Perrmiomeds War OF Mandar and Prono. Bind RebuEST FoR. STAY Wh The Course OF Appeal. Appellare DST DIVISION 3 Wrihour Deuding the Meets. (2) Did the California Supreme Couer avid the Cour oF Appeal Foutrn Appellate Oseicr Div. Folluee TO Cecide Federal ConStiTUTIONAL Issues DRETUGICE eT rloneR. | (3) Dp The Tesves Presented, by PorTIONeR 16 the Lower FOR CUMS W Ths CEG, DRecsely CoMCIde Wr this | COURS UNAVIMOUS CetisiOn I tiled Vs. CabiFoewia. (uy) Ate the issues DRecemted oF SIQMIFICAMT “el imMpactr ONO OF GevePal IMPORTS To The UoEMITY, OF CeasionS wrtim the stare OF Califoeid and This COURTS Cecsiovs i Aled v5. COMFORAIA aud Sonlessea V. coleslore WW Regaueds 16 Wareditrless SeatOF Cellphones ovd"OigiTal. Cara. (5) Should the erere cour a “\ Woke Of TiS honordulk; CERT ONE Ewha FORE. Pe (ec) Ze WiyTal do token FROM DerTiOMers cellphone subsecrTo Seen aril er nant ae v\ ee Sear UlroseWeMOMM Was eke POM Ove ) Se a wisetenr gaurd +m state ote xTRaC oF ne Derrnionee 15 or the Tie OF Seaeen Fegpuless QUESTIONS PREsene: PASE 2) (4) Should the Reapondetre wm this cose be allowed TO US Diqital Dawe exréscred from Pernmoners Celle , Doowe Withour o weeeovtr Woe “ous pRocess OF law OF ony i, GOGIST PETITIONER aS evidence dyaiisr im wane OncoMg THAL i this Canal Case, When thar digtralDaa 6 the <ole 05S OF PesponGes case apy tst PerrOve Guid Mowe OF The exceDI= IWS BVMOUNCRO bY This HovoRalALe COURT 16. the Ware ONT ReQUIREMeNT IM t's ORecedertT SETTING decision IM Riley Vs. COMPORMIG (20r4) wees OResentt: () Oo calenid Pevalcode % 4510 (6), 1 ©(¢) aud The holdings OF his Vag Cover i ley vo. California & a \ \ (Ol aM perme Oro Av Wer vee Wwe sore WSR FSMe OC Gar Gud Charge PeTtiovs (0) ould the digrol dare taken Feom PerTTIGWERS Prove Wrinour 6 wWoteair Wok Due ORoceSs OF LAW OF any Avid 6 SuDPRESSR PuRSUSMIT CaliPORNIG’ eral. Code 16365 Peldtd On AMIS HoviGRable courts Holdivigs WM Ploy, VS. CALTORMIG (cont) and CabFOeNIasS OW State Deval Code «her ae CXCCTLY Witnthar holding Seis el Uae DE CO UROA VEO UR 4 AMOAOMENT GF The US.