No. 21-7659
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review business-records criminal-prosecution hearsay-exception interrogation-statements miranda-rights outsider-source standard-of-review trustworthiness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity CriminalProcedure Immigration
SocialSecurity CriminalProcedure Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court's error of admitting the 795-SSA form through the business records exception to the hearsay rule
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court’s error of admitting the 795-SSA form through the business records exception to the hearsay rule where the documents were prepared in furtherance of a potential criminal prosecution. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court’s error of allowing testimony of statements obtained during interrogation without Miranda waiver under the booking exception. I
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2022)
Attorneys
John Doe
Derege Demissie — Demissie & Church, Petitioner
Derege Demissie — Demissie & Church, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent