No. 21-7661
Antron Adon Tucker v. Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment barker-v-wingo constitutional-right due-process prosecutorial-delay sixth-amendment speedy-trial statutory-interpretation statutory-right virginia-constitution
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Constitutional right to a speedy-trial has been violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner's Constitutional right to a speedy trial ; has been violated,also his statutory right to a speedy trial. Pursuant to U.S. Constitution Sixth Amendment and Virginia Const.. | Article 1 8 Sixth Amendment,and if the four factors in Barker-vWingo 407 U.S. 514 weigh in favor of the Petitioner? 2. Whether the Court Of Appeals Of Virginia and the State trial Court erred and abused it's discretion in denying Appellant's mopion to discharge and forever bar the prosecution against him for failing to prosecute him within the time period allowed by ; Code of Virginia 19.2-243? a , | a . i
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2021-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2022)
Attorneys
Virginia
Kelci N. Smith — Wythe County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, Respondent
Kelci N. Smith — Wythe County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, Respondent