No. 21-7667
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflicting-rulings constitutional-rights due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence fair-trial innocence-evidence judicial-discretion presumption-of-innocence publication-of-decisions unpublished-decisions
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Shouldn't it be illegal to suppress evidence?
How can 2 court cases give conflicting rulings
for the same evidence?
How can evidence which says a person is innocent
be 'too helpful' for the jury?
Isn't a defendant supposed to be innocent until
PROVEN guilty?
Why aren't all cases Published? It seems discriminatory
to arbitrarily decide which cases can be published or not.
Shouldn't the US Supreme Court rule: All Appeal judgements
must be published?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Shouldn't it be illegal to suppress evidence?
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2022-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)
Attorneys
California
Catherine Amy Rivlin — CA Department of Justice, Respondent
Daniel Irving
Daniel Irving — Petitioner