No. 21-7667
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflicting-rulings constitutional-rights due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence fair-trial innocence-evidence judicial-discretion presumption-of-innocence publication-of-decisions unpublished-decisions
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Shouldn't it be illegal to suppress evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Shouldn’t it be illegal to suppress evidence? How can 2 court cases give conflicting rulings ‘for the same evidence? ‘ ; | How can evidence which says a person is innocent be ‘too helpful’ for the jury? . Isn't a defendant supposed to be innocent until _ PROVEN guilty? Why aren't all cases Published? It seems discriminatory to arbitrarily decide which cases can be published or not. Shouldn't the US Supreme Court rule: All Appeal judgements must be published? Se
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2022-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)
Attorneys
California
Catherine Amy Rivlin — CA Department of Justice, Respondent
Catherine Amy Rivlin — CA Department of Justice, Respondent