No. 21-7672

Jermaine E. Spence v. Reemon Bishara, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights court-dismissal dismissal due-process evidence in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion pro-se-litigation procedural-due-process standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were the causes of action substantiated by evidence or was the trial court not in error in dismissing the case?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1. Were the causes of action described in the appellant’s trial court principal brief of 1:20-cv-0230 against 25 defendants substantiated by the evidence laid forth on the docket of the Clerk of the 11th District Court (Middle District of Georgia -Albany) or was the trial court not error in dismissing the case? 2. Was the trial court judge in error in approving the motion for in forma pauperis but then immediately dismissing WITHOUT Marshal service the case? 3. Should a 11th Circuit court judge deny a completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis if the movant is actually without resources to pay the circuit court filing fee? 4. Is a 28 U.S.C. secs 351-364 complaint filed with the 11th circuit against indgptesilie Abrams Gardner for Gardners involuntary resignation moot without reason? Mr. Spence did file the complaint in motion formg pr 47/3? SupCtPetForCert230 ‘ page iii Il.

Docket Entries

2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)

Attorneys

Jermaine E. Spence
Jermaine E. Spence — Petitioner
Jermaine E. Spence — Petitioner