No. 21-7674
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court due-process fourth-circuit reversible-error sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by refusing to hear Mr. Allen's meritorious claims that the district court committed reversible error in not granting Mr. Allen a two-level reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY REFUSING TO HEAR MR. ALLEN’S MERITORIOUS CLAIMS THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN NOT GRANTING MR. ALLEN A TWO-LEVEL REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3553(F). 1
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Allen
James Edward Yeager Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent