No. 21-7678
IFP
Tags: arizona-v-united-states constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure edwards-v-vannoy federal-preemption indian-country judicial-jurisdiction mcculloch-v-maryland preemption state-court-powers tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State's contortion of Edwards v. Vannoy (2021) to delimit Indian Country powers into new rules of criminal procedure can be permitted to invalidate the preemption analyses of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Arizona v. United States (2012)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a State’s contortion of Edwards v. Vannoy (2021) to delimit Indian Country powers into new rules of criminal procedure can be permitted to invalidate the preemption analyses of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Arizona v. United States (2012)? 2. Whether a State court of criminal appeals’ wrongful manufacture of jurisdiction over federally recognized tribal members” results in an unconstitutional judicial resuscitation of 138th Amendment prohibitions?
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Robert Elton
Robert Elton — Petitioner