Whether the U.S. Middle-District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The U.S, Middle-Dishvet aunts ante II th, Appeals haunts ARe listed-ReSpondents IN the QASE ON Pie iy Which Violated Equalprotect DNManges , Further, bith inVblyad lyuer. Py. “URIS has decided 4y Important: Queshon dF Federa)Statute ANd laws jy 4 Way that 43 Repugnanty the Dy Hitchin AN, the tsa lover Dysstete 1SSyed Ypinrdng / Rudings ARE ty Repugnant 4y bach dher's Rulings: and the DRigINA) Filpg lRetsrds and Material Pvidennebey. ‘tering the Lase | Claims Tp Lase/Plaims betipe Ahis US, Lyurty 18 Suppaicted by hqutdcted QuprN -\FFidavity (Aah. Matme / NON-Respsycns Nearly Mausible ay There Face . hetrhaner Sthtes That vb 18 AN Natonalimporta x 0e M having the Supreme-lsuice ty detide the quesAus DF Layh ANd Facts tVslyed he}ope this WS. Psurt. _ — i tt ee OEE ee |