No. 21-7687
Earl Jones v. Ohio
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-review fact-inference jackson-standard reasonable-doubt standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence supreme-court-ohio
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reviewing court must consider all the evidence in determining whether inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts are reasonable to prove an ultimate fact beyond a reasonable doubt
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a reviewing court must consider all the evidence in determining whether inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts are reasonable to prove an ultimate fact beyond a reasonable doubt. i
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of Ohio to respond filed.
2022-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 25, 2022)
2022-02-09
Application (21A399) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 22, 2022.
2022-02-02
Application (21A399) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 21, 2022 to April 22, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Earl Jones
Peter Galyardt — Office of the Ohio Public Defender, Petitioner
State of Ohio
Ronald W. Springman Jr. — Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent