Can the court disregard that Wells Fargo failed to provide promised next steps, failed to provide individual notice and opt-out opportunity as required by Rule 23, failed to provide notifications and forms as ordered by the judge, and failed to provide disabled parties the same notifications and options as other class members?

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Can the court disregard: one, that Wells Fargo promised to provide the “next steps to be taken regarding unauthorized account openings’; however, that Wells Fargo never provided the next steps to be taken to two, that Rule 23 stipulates individual notice must be given to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort, including an opportunity to opt out; however, that despite the fact that Plaintiff-Appellant had been identified, individual notice, including an opportunity to opt out, was never given to three, that United States District Judge VINCE CHHABRIA listed notifications and forms, including an opt-out form, that must be provided to class members in order to satisfy Rule 23 and due process; however, that no notifications or forms designated by Judge VINCE CHHABRIA were ever provided to and four, that Title II of the ADA mandates disabled parties be issued the same notifications and options issued to other class members; _ however, that the notifications and options issued to other class members were never issued to disabled PlaintiffAppellant, Raleigh Rogers? ; i