Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' policy of reviewing plain error only prevents appellate counsel from raising all claims of error in a single appeal and obtaining final judgment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; IL How does the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals policy of reviewing plain error only prevent appellate counsel from “raising all claims of error in a single appeal,” and therefore obtaining “final judgment”. IL. How did the U.S. District Court-Western District of Oklahoma act in a manner Inconsistent with due process of law in denying Petitioner’s Rule 60(b)(4) motion for Relief from Judgment or Order? “The judgment in question dismissed Heddlesten’s of Habeas Corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 as untimely.” ii