No. 21-7713
William Neely v. Superior Court of California, Sacramento County
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-tampering due-process fourteenth-amendment liberty-interest post-trial-discovery
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the safegards provided by the 14th Amendment apply to the state's unreasonable denial of post-trial criminal discovery where Petitioner, with newly discovered evidence of DNA tampering, has substantial liberty interest in obtaining additional discovery to which he would have been entitled to at trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Do the safegards provided by the 14th Amendment apply to the state's unreasonable denial of post-trial criminal discovery where Petitioner, with newly discovered evidence of DNA tampering, has substantial liberty interest in obtaining additional discovery to which he would have been entitled to at trial?
Docket Entries
2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-18
Waiver of right of respondent Superior Court of Sacramento County to respond filed.
2022-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Superior Court of Sacramento County
Justain P. Riley — CA Dept. of Justice: Office of the AG, Respondent
Justain P. Riley — CA Dept. of Justice: Office of the AG, Respondent