No. 21-7715

Lacy E. Lewis v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process exhaustion-of-state-remedies federal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court for Florida improperly procedurally barred the petitioner's claim for failing to exhaust state remedies, where the record shows facts contrary to this finding

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED To AW Framework WS Sxplained PRA wri dli&ms Vv: TAHOY , 524 US, , 32, (20 gcd, I¥Gs , IW Léd 2d .394q (2000), Foe REN LY Per 28 Use, BBS . v a + CAH Destrons , Under Pre Codtrard to if nese. ae so ne pedborty where there State © (duds peshected to AddresS the Primary Zssre o£ tine Dek honeys rnettechy € 258i Ssbance oF ¢ovasei claim thet W272 Remended Back do tA ¢ posd Convit don Courd Ry She state of Ploia< Second Qichict Courd OF Apes! rer ao ¢ FiNdin rynine eas daahiney Wearing Poe 8 Fe Saas. clrend bo whew ari2l COumsel$ 4% Tee hee cnaroed an Ueoel ey vavreble Defense +o = ‘spendr a wh ion o€ Suralavry Was inerbec we Ses are Aroeat Adare $ Court © @ Snow ore ae arr eae a nec fresiens® im te "4 * cared Stak DSA “1 Un ; (avse ore gen, Flory da DBE food Meeorted the dedinss Ped fain due, ve wr Unertaveled | COM}FAM Oe re cers ptyachee Exhavsed BS Cateiweecr ees og Elopron Oe Cadi}ed Apes e din , Shout ox Havey peFenst vad Aels os Sj vA Failed o1G Tre oe vse 29sy¥ ) ne om) hen an oe ees | SE ae claim 2d UDex ASM OU sy aX Conard, FY Pr eSended +A state Wish ee ¥ Courts Prey rvs vy ‘ aghs é | ( Enxtoasted Ar every Stade level | Ava; lable Mder Fla. haw , See | — LARReadiy (4) (8) Ce) Has the Dre COuc} For Fldrida Nomen YNredkzud Coucd OF She United Stalec -evred rN Proce durai)y barring ~ he yey Hoaers \larm foc Palins Ay Oxtwvas) al State flemediz ¢ ; Lohan the yvecor) Bas facks [Pre tontyvaqd to this Fiandins. Does the Ni Stywred Coury Rolings Contra dict V£levan} Supreme Courd Cases, Hat SejJ She : Criteria Be Agvigw of 28 USC. Jay Perms See Carty v. Packer 1Saq US, 318,193 Si Ch Bex SY Led 29 (2002), Has the DiSdwet Courd Adsudicaded 2N | TN Sv4e the d coas Never Cesolved ‘7A the Stade Coucd¢d On iF 6 Merr ds , . Cond the Stale Coord was Farety PC SoH of he s<cue Por CBee reseclouhwr. Where fhe Meera ef lect an Dn Subhe 2ared jretve| Find ms ' \Nas dhe Masittraty Lrrogad Udeptys the Stetes dedknse [oe unertaveded , Cnd Procedural ry barrvas the pe ders Clesm o L Tne Fede tive RESSEtanCe 0 fF CovnrSt] dr Advi Siny She Padddvaer thed ConSend Kram owner |)rad lor d AS bape Se +o — Iodhe oClupysny Jernms Way GY Viablt Ae dense an dh Chars+ od kage og 7 Pourelary vader Fla tenet Law? { | |

Docket Entries

2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Inch to respond filed.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)

Attorneys

Lacy Lewis
Lacy E. Lewis — Petitioner
Mark Inch
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Florida Attorney General, Respondent