Whether Welhee Jackson is entitled to relief on an evidentiary hearing where the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas decision conflicts with other courts' opinions, when Jackson presented a claim of actual innocence accompanied by a claim of constitutional violation, a denial of effective assistance of counsel that was contrary to, or unreasonably applied to, Jackson's federal right to due process of his 5th and 14th amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Whelhee Jackson is entitled yo RelieP o@ ao Eviderhrey Headivg where Ye Lloted Sates Court a slpeals ria Crocus oud Ghe United Shales Drsad Cousl KeVhe Wedthean Dishael . of Tews clecision Cowlhats wih GMher Courts oe 1 Own | OPwon , whew Tacsod paesedted Claim of Actual Towocenco accompawed tay a Claim oF (yustlaloddl viohelwo, a Ddewinl oF ERetive fissichance af Counsel Whef was cooleaty 4o, oR | oyerrvely -udrengooAble Applicaliod Jo Tackeow , fedeaah ght Yo Due Paces of his CM ad 14" dinewdlmerts). | | | | | |