No. 21-7718

Mark A. Winger v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2022-04-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-violation constitutional-due-process due-process materiality materiality-standard perjury post-conviction-petition prosecutorial-misconduct united-states-v-agurs witness-perjury
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a State prisoner's post-conviction petition claim of a Brady violation alleging perjury by a State's witness at trial, whose false testimony prosecutors relied upon and failed to correct must be reviewed under the lower standard of 'materiality' established by United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether a State prisoner's post-conviction petition claim of a Brady violation alleging perjury by a State's witness at trial, whose false testimony prosecutors relied upon and failed to correct must be reviewed under the lower standard of "materiality" established by United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). | cree ene ens ee teen ete on ea st ann ceinnerninn cite tee nanan fe Sane tenet ts (i)

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-05-02
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)

Attorneys

Illinois
Katherine Marie DoerschOffice of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent
Mark A. Winger
Mark Winger — Petitioner