No. 21-7720
Matthew William Wheeler, aka Matthew Williams v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-intent mail-fraud prosecutorial-misconduct scheme-to-deceive scheme-to-defraud wire-fraud
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Government Must Prove an Intent to Harm as an Element in Establishing a Defendant's Participation in a 'Scheme to Defraud' in Any Prosecution for Conspiracy to Commit and the Substantive Offense of Mail or Wire Fraud
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Government Must Prove an Intent to Harm as an Element in Establishing a Defendant’s Participation in a “Scheme to Defraud” in Any Prosecution for Conspiracy to Commit and the Substantive Offense of Mail or Wire Fraud A. Scheme to Defraud vs. Scheme to Merely Deceive B. Scope of the Conspiracy C. Prosecutorial Misconduct — Telling the Jury to Ignore the Theory of Defense i
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Matthew Wheeler
Charles G. White — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent