No. 21-7722
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky civil-rights equal-protection jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination voir-dire
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois Appellate Court erred in not finding the State's reason for removing two Black prospective jurors was pretext for discrimination
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether the Illinois Appellate Court erred where it did not find that the State’s reason requesting the removal of two Black prospective jurors was a pretext for purposeful discrimination. 2) Whether intervention from this Court is needed to fulfill the promise of Batson by regulating voir dire so as to prevent the removal of prospective jurors where such removal has a discriminatory effect on a defendant’s jury. i
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-08
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Illinois
Santonio Byars
Christopher W. Buckley — Office of the State Appellate Defender, Petitioner
Christopher W. Buckley — Office of the State Appellate Defender, Petitioner