No. 21-7726
Michael Charles Sartin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certiorari CJA-plan criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-procedure misinformation post-conviction-relief wilkins-precedent wilkins-v-united-states writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether misinformation about the timeframe for seeking certiorari in violation of a lower court's CJA plan entitles a defendant to a GVR consistent with Wilkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 468 (1979)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether misinformation about the timeframe for seeking certiorari in violation of a lower court’s CJA plan entitles a defendant to a GVR consistent with Wilkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 468 (1979). 1
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Sartin
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent