Whether the dismissal of a Section 2254 petition based on failure to exhaust state remedies should be overturned, given that the judgment conflicts with other federal circuit rulings holding that unjustifiable excessive state system appellate delay violates the petitioner's constitutional rights and constitutes a deprivation of due process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Please note thu a oth the ited Stetes District Court heteinatter | piskeick Court _] Cys 4% NiTeEs ITa O O Reyeas\s VO rne. , Py = Pelitoners BU 35$ 2254 WRIT fo eos Comes fheretrakle, > Section 2254 / but rather ruled only onthe reouicemert fo exhavst | <) ° 7 <1 ke Nireck apecal remedies. proce. cra ec 2 +h his ketthon e + a { O LCN Oe PYESeNTS hexore ns Mast Hono relo(e. Co On Pe. “ al S 07) C Mm NO S& Ls ‘ing ows é ia © e a ¢. i? a . Mon FTe C2 con (a ct Th Ow as _o Ame MarrTer, on Sailure-bo exhaust state mmedies be overturned, aiveothut | c ~ the Sudgement conk\icts with other Federal Cin rsa ifn holds ney UN UST: OIC EXce @ Stare mm 29 CWakTe cle la On a ° AY Pe COM oO Sin ah onui ction Pxemp me non, 5 is A%, fa nds | F \ exhaustion of stuke VemedJoc regsirementi O TTN/ DNAS HAs S6 4 Lion © PAAw YE Aves Te 2ire me Ola r Pa eh al \ Queslion 2. ay a Aismissal ato eckion 2254 Pertrion bused on — futlure to exhaust stare remedies, he overs \ aiventhatthe | ___vdgemenf conflicts with other Federal Grew its nvlings holding ~Ahet, unjustifiuble excessive stube syctemappellate delay via ute; the Appellant. felitoners Constit tioned) Rights, and constitutes |_a. deprivation of Due Process, suCictent grounds to justify the _ exerc7se o% Federal Hulbeas Turnisdictingy Question 3. Maya Aismissal ofa Seclion 2254 fetT Hon, base Gedgementt conSiicts with Hotsaume Circuits Binding Precedent ; on same emp ortant matter na Mtag thas unjust Gable excessive. stake system appellate Aclay constihiles existence oC cincumstaares preset _in_stobe appeals process thotmrender tht process ineSCecfue-bo protect the Rights ofthe prisome ond {s gmunds jo exempTechavsiian o [emehies SO OOCOCOCOCSCSCSCSSS | rt i wt ie lage aggellase Seles, Violukes the bgqedlant PAifioneds CansKibHonal Rights and co Les a Sep dvotion o& Due Process cognizable. 7 | __Gvestion 5S. Naya Memissal ofa Section 2254 Pet/fon bused on Eure to exhaust stute remedies, be overtucned, given that | the judgement so Cac departed Som and conflicts uit th ——wedier, naling that exhaustion nega icement is nobgueisdidional | _ or winding onthe Fieral Court (out merely comiby based | that thus Galure to exhaust is not an alosolute far to fAdeoss elevant Lecicions on same important matter, holding that stabe system grants the right-to on appeals process Grom Auk process myst he Constitu fronclly comporting mad be conducted svfectdto the femands of Due Process, __ | i TT QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : | . (Use as many pages as necessary to present your question(s) to the Court) | Please See Attached ‘ } | |