No. 21-7733
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 924(c) conviction-validity crime-of-violence criminal-procedure davis-precedent due-process sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-offense united-states-v-davis vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
can-conviction-stand-on-non-existent-offense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented 1) Can a conviction and punishment stand on a non-existent statutory offense, based on it being dismissed? , 2) Was Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A)(iii) conviction based on a crime of violence after the government and district court . explicitly dismissed the drug trafficking crime, and during sentencing... throughout the entire proceeding, adamantly expressed that their sentence was based on a crime of violence which , would affect the vagueness of 924(c) former residual clause resolved through, United States v. Davis 139 S.Ct. 2319, 204 ; L.Ed.Zd. 757 (2019)? | | Be Se
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Rashod Lewis
Rashod Lewis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent