Did the Supreme Court of Wisconsin err in ruling on the defendant's right to effective counsel?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the Supreme Court of Wisconsin error in khevr nmuling on my right to have effective Counsel z 2. Tid the Supreme Court of Wisconain properly rule on My attorney’s ‘\neffeckiwe astsstance af counsel ® 3. Did he Court of Appeals propery rule on My attorney’s wet fective. ascisstance of caunsel? 4. Were My Xerval courk attar ney ‘wetlCectiwe Cor Faling xo pursue a suppression argument and that *ne dendant had Standing Ywurk because He was not advised cight \y Ws counsel, Yhe AeSendant Adv’ xake Xe Posrer1sn Anatc he prone WAS his Aue %e Wis counsel Xeling Him Maat the Stake’s acar ney cauld use Anis against Me when go “Le Xrial\ but Ww realalryy Sone Grates attorney comlan’> use Ans Aaqganst me ak +rial and \F 4 would’Vve Wwnew Xs, \ wouldve cook che position xhat Xhe. Phone was wine ? 5. Did “ne Mepleton Police Department Weaall Karly SQrZe_ wir, Douglas's ceN\ phone % bb. Did the Appleton Police Department \Weaally use a “Stallong Worse’? Xa search we. Dovalas’s vA NO LD 1k .