Whether Counsel for Defendant was ineffective as trial counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether Counsel for Defendant was ineffective as trial counsel for his failure ta make proper objection. II. Whether, the evidence presented was insufficient to support the conviction, and whethéz, the findings were against the ~manifest weight and or sufficient weight of the evidence of kidnapping (sexual activity), Gross Sexual Imposition (by force), and Assault. The U.S. District Court's decision stands in direct conflict with this Court's decision in Mayle v. Felix, supra, and leaves the question as to Whether, Petitioner has been denied due process and a fair trial Dist. LEXIS 199003(S.D. Ohio, Oct. 24, 2020) | i