Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's case based on the government's assertion of a state-secrets privilege without conducting an in-camera review of the relevant documents

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Seb ritled 2h fourdrafeed writs Peerborart tn busch [25% Tile 23 20-00-0318 8 unas bag feseh ey One 76 th, 5,Ck ay i f0,-distrrat L600 lembta/ My Heo Mo, stated, beer Ope a “ie 19h ee Lh 40 ih 2 2 Ly a7 ‘ ee Mtr "A1S ip 4G LofeHqof~a TI decembe RoRL, ; . a in only re spone ebelya Memo dated (E222 2), Arat ted “t, recoived atter 4 Subs Meg 4 een order: emo ra. whure / ater rece Ved ocumenl]? Ip om Treasury dept ust XL “awaiting Waforqagien trom Trent ont Ok, SH ded ing With the (Tob) ist L Sept, Th » Owly giving The Memo's Te bur lt Ny Case ab, af! It