No. 21-7757

Mark Stinson v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict-of-interest constitutional-provisions due-process fair-trial judicial-inquiry right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Judge inquire into the propriety of the issue?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether a Judge inquire into the propriety of the issue? 2. Whether the mere possibility of a conflict of interest warrants the conclusion that the defendant was deprived of his right to counsel and a fair trial? 3. Whether there was a violation of the Sixth Amendment Right? | |

Docket Entries

2022-08-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-06-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2022)

Attorneys

Mark Stinson
Mark Stinson — Petitioner
Mark Stinson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent