Should this court apply the Napue due process for a defendant who pleads guilty?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ch || __ | #e4 Should this ¢ oust_appl j—+h e__N ofue ik | 7 Drocess fox _o_deLendank whom _pleads—guilteyr— | = ia laddvlion, apply the Napue Due Process ts the | Rule reguicenne Fe | BEA Will he Covel allow 2talociag judge — | to rely pes _maberiahy oc Pachrelly— Ralse | bestioory ond _stalemeats made by coy witaess ~ leader the taSluence ot oavebhies (deugs) = _ lin cddihen, uliliee suchas _relelive eonduch pad Acigsimanahe — ltie3 lo ae chould eresneous \onpocdzon of | Sentence be ee ¢onsioh of udilizalion oP a Paloc bestimooy, uncerrohowaked or uncel= i able heavseg evidence considered 2 piste esha oo esnmocnissseakense Lap) Can gish_oP 9 _seahencing judge demapiae a | AeGendart_to_<peabk in—hisoun=elense4 cand — HOxes cot ellos te sxiky a festa ae 2 HS 1S or Shauld_a Breech _o& Pea Necee mene . | be a_ersoneoes_ox illegals entence 2? oe CO | QUESTIONS PRESEMTED | H2G Shou ldo Will Vhs Covet apply be Naoue Due Process to relalive eonducd Piadiags—dacing pleas a ee PO ——— —_— oe LIST OF DReTSES lO\\_cacties agceac a Me —caehos_o} the | | CBSE._Ow Tre _covec_ page, _ | | “ OS ROSES lses om Cdedneg | antad Biiwe : — TASdAR Des | Sor bor| PT ow si pas “avs SH luwaxes STATES COASTI UTEDSS ! a TINVOWN ES __ an Sree rnems oh= Mae Case i ctoka\ of “hoa 8 | | Se _ come ussrnng __: — =.Can® OF SE Qyyree pees ‘. Tete Se Ao -' | “TVTESLE OF BWTHOCITES . , : Ug ech Sarees Cons Wy FRET AE DINE rT DAS roress C8Ses Nipue. SN OFS 430 1.8. Db 069, 7 s.e7 WI, | daa ea adap hiasgy ——fe Vin NMS. 4% U.S. 1501532154 AA DCT 763 oa Beg oa ted avg) site sracsssteemis buen 488 $ all __§ A esas ane wesapp pO peo __ — BS erm Dée-}\_Terones, 3b4_E. Swap +30 6845 | NSN aS Dew texts 1255 ts S.y_Genbey eh.a) 9017 1018S oe 0 28.9619 |B ys. y Re vanicomets 422 Kise 24D 2u| (3th cic cers) gS Iss zu. ga 720 F.3d 502,541 (Mocs 2018) % PSs siewmuns Ud ad OBH_,19%9_ U.S. sep. __ XS _heyss 9277 3Qd cheauss as me sus nee ate e620 S.2A_ 0 2F_ 2012. al ——pa— Sat d\sig Dewitd SiC She F.3d, 200 Pf us: Rep Nexas 832) — po Bee: e\ Greckwaler, 288 Pb. 3d 7272p _ \a IMs. App Lexcs GHOF Wa eu fateh san ose ate 5hS_E.3_ 1060 ae — Me ———__—_—lus._eep laws 1645 %_ sia eke _ ee J\Uomes saceS 4 Bowe DW fSeeu _ : Recemdax fc —_—_— [ocdec Nemaist cAwtenris\ ond celssGr“ha _ S IN THE ; SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW : lof For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at