Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court, by sanctioning a summary judgment that was granted without a trial, where there are facts material to the case that were in genuine dispute

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Weather the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts , with relevant decisions of this Court, by sanctioning a summary judgment that was granted without a trial, where there are facts material to the case that were in genuine dispute. | 2. Weather the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | violates petitioner’s Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury. 3. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit properly dismissed petitioner's employment discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., where petitioner has provided copious evidence of facts. 4. Whether Title VII's retaliation provision and similarly worded statutes require a plaintiff to prove but-for causation (i.e., that | an employer would not have taken an adverse employment | action but for an improper motive), or instead require only , proof that the employer had a mixed motive (i.e., that an , improper motive was one of multiple reasons for the 7 employment action). | |