No. 21-7781

Jorge Palacios v. Kevin Smith

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-assistance legal-procedure medical-care standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why was my testimony denied?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Why Hee 944 Cree it Court dented to we 20 exyerS Tertiinony thress te clarsFy doubts 2nd fe Suy port my evgu mort ? Why (he Fh, Great (ouyt doriect 3 me the eto my ass pytenie 2 Wes legal ey assistive leuise conkisrottars by yespondert, Lespite in y complexity of my medye, Con Sidvor and Serprus Wmedecel weed? Was legal denied To me by Ves pon bert an] we walker wrth Seat when wy qaiaful Ingu imal bernia yvaw worse eltrost Jem. ? Was legal dclayyay my [A§u rural hee Surgery for C2) two yea sl Weg \e3a\ Colas F Few ovevsyqlit ko Sead ty! To basyital, yrolonged Wy Sobtev ing by fa )yravy fe Wy Kernia sugary & Wes Vesal \at. due The ry berure Su rQery delay now T sufbey for pos TP surgery sie effects \ke Ciivonre Pair

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-11
Waiver of right of respondent Kevin Smith to respond filed.
2022-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Jorge Palacios
Jorge Palacios — Petitioner
Jorge Palacios — Petitioner
Kevin Smith
Neah HuynhOffice of the Attorney General State of California, Respondent
Neah HuynhOffice of the Attorney General State of California, Respondent