No. 21-7783

Reynaldo Aviles v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-924c3b 28-usc-2255 certificate-of-appealability circuit-split johnson-v-united-states procedural-default section-2255 vagueness-challenge
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a certificate of appealability may be issued where there is a circuit split

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether, given that there is a split in the circuits on the question, reasonable jurists could debate whether controlling circuit precedent precludes issuance of a certificate of appealability in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, where there is a split in the circuits on the question. 2. Whether the Court should resolve the three-way circuit split regarding whether, and under what circumstances, a movant’s procedural default may be excused because his constitutional vagueness challenge was “not reasonably available” prior to Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015). 3. Whether a general verdict that was obtained in reliance on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) may be sustained based on the reviewing court’s finding that the jury also relied on a valid basis to convict. i INTERESTED PARTIES Petitioner submits that there are no

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Reynaldo Aviles
Janice L. BergmannFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent