Question not identified

No question identified. : Queshons Presented Fov Review . Due to the lack of vesources while pretvia\ inca rcevatca at Honolulu Fedeval Detention Cenky C’F De") L apologize for using recytled paper. Pencil, and my TRULINKS email to to dvatt this and inco rporahng United States Supreme Couvt docket * 21-6415 as it provides velahve Hanser ipts and documnis a Which led to tS Petihon for Writ of Cerhovari as my Prose Status was taken away by U.S. bistncl Court Judge J. Michaet Scalovight C"dudge seabight “) which ts the result of his ordernng my patent Psycho tne ra py records fom my treah A ‘ doctod, Psycniatvist ovev , my objechons.Sce Exhibit E Order and Lup Ce Det GHS. | Qugshen #) Should the Assistant United States Atorney C’AUSAY) In 4 criminal case la able 4p order ‘mal Court subpoenas , two months ™m advance , knowing there would be no tial, then producing fake grand Jury Subpoenas” fori those trial Couvt Sulopoenas , a Suter tugs to Qnitnue wveskgahing A Criminal delendant vesulring, in 5 piecem | indictments wihin~3 years, violation of pyo se ctendants be s& and \4th Amendment Conshtuthonal Rights: (See Lacy v. Mavicopa, AS Fad $46, 413-14, where the 4 Circuit Court of Appeals held tata prosccutoy who waprorery issued fake Subpoenas was not enttHed to absolute immunity). _ Queshon #2 Should a distic Court’ judge be able ty order sua spore: 4 pro se criminal defendants treatin paychiatvist pahentPsychotherapy Over Criminal Aactendant's obycchen hen convually use those recovas against criminal defendant, revoking he pro ‘status On Eeloruary 4, 2022 Céxhibit C Pp aBpyail in opposite ot what Jattee v. Redmond, (Gis ust, 135 ed 2, 234, Wes 4. 1426(1445)) protected whine parent = psycho therapy privite e? : A Queshon #3 \s at ructual evvor CEarclia v.Caliornia, *1? SS 806 ° 14%5)} when a distinct court judge vevokes a criminal detendan pre se Sis to veprcsent nersole dun sentenaing based on“... son) wdicahon that she simply coulda Pt and \d not follow wna required of ber, "So Yevoking 4 criminal deter da ere se oe based on what might ha ppen 7(Sec Exibit C Fe. 28 ~ ‘s Ue — ated: Apri 10,2022 Honolulu pHawair Rule 14.1Cd) Statement ef Wunsdichon Reference. 40 Opinion Below On Felowuary 4,2022 , My prose status Wi my Criminal case was revoked by a United States Distict Court Sudge for Ine Distict of Hawai. On February 1$,2022,, I fted a Writ of Mandamus for final Order Revokiig My ProSe Status in my crimina\ Case per 2Uscs § 1241 as a final decision and 23 USC.S.8 165) wnich was docketed as US.CA No. 22-0022 CExhibit A) On Maret 11, 2022 my Pethm Was denied CEchibitb). On Aewl 1, 2022, 1 fled dis mely Writ of Certioran to the United States —_ Ake ‘S Pleading WW aood Raith. AeA: April At, 2022_ . Honelulu, Hawai TRULINCS 09779122 SULLIVAN, LEIHINAHINA Unit: HON-F-B FROM: 09779122 TO: SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION DATE: 04/07/2022 03:28:46 PM STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION On February 4, 2022, my pro se status in my criminal case was revoked by a United States District Court Judge for the District of Hawaii. On February 18, 2022, | filed a Writ of Mandamus for Final Order Revoking My Pro Se Status in My Criminal Case per as a final decision and 28 U.S.C.S. Section 1651 which was docketed as (ei -70022 (Exhibit_A). On March 17, 2022 my Petition was denied (Exhibit B). On April 1, 2022, | filed this timely Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court which has jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Section 1254. 3