Writ of Mandamus to Correct Constitutional Violations

No question identified. : I, Statement of-Application for Intervention Presented to the Honorable Chief Justice CASE TITLE: Rafael Cezar Danam v. Arizona Board of Education, Diane Douglass Et Al. : The “Perpetual Union” of the United States of America is established by the United States : Constitution as the “Supreme Law of the Land” in Article VI, Paragraph 2, which therefore no : Justice of the United States District Court nor Justice of the Supreme Court of a State can violate, but rather must defend and uphold the Constitution pursuant to Article III, Sections 1 and 2 and , “Oath of Office” pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 453. Errors of injustice violating the Constitution ; must have forum for “Redress of Grievances” by authority of the First Amendment and foundational premise of “EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW” where the Supreme Court of the United States, Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) by First Chief Justice John Jay stated, “Justice is indiscriminately due to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank.” That “Justice” established in Preamble of the Constitution is sought by Honorable Chief Justice John G. _ Roberts, Jr. for interventions of constitutional violations and questions of law presented due to judicial fundamental errors by the United States District Court of Arizona by Writ of Mandamus. President Abraham Lincoln defined the “Perpetual Union” of the United States of America established in the United States Constitution, in his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln stated: The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by } the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And finally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the ‘ , Constitution was to form a more perfect Union 1.) Application to Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. as designated by jurisdiction over the United ° States District Courts pursuant 28 U.S. Code § 42, Appellant as Applicant Rafael Cezar Danam presents pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22 by authority of Article III, Sections 1 and 2, and . Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution, Applicant presents pursuant to First . Amendment “Redress of Grievances” from United States District Court of Arizona in violation of 42 US Code § 1983 and § 1988, Applicant’s Right of “Trial by Jury” pursuant to Seventh Amendment against Arizona Board of Education, Et Al, Appellees as Defendants for violation of the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2. | | 2.) Application to Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, United States Constitution Article III, Sections 1 and 2, by Applicant Rafael Cezar Danam as Appellant _ from United States District Court of Arizona against Arizona Board of Education, Et Al, Appellees as Defendants for violation of 42 US Code § 1983 and § 1988 for Defendants violations of U.S. Constitution First (I), Fifth (V), Sixth (VI), Eighth (VIII) and Fourteenth (XIV) Amendments; furthermore State of Arizona violations by jurisdiction pursuant to 28 , U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. § 1343 based on 42 U.S.C. §1983, State law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367 for violations of Arizona Constitution Article 2, § 4, 5, 6 and 32. Applicant seeks right of vindication from constitutional violations by “Redress of Grievances” by Writ of Mandamus. . , Zl. Questions for Application to Chief Justice for Writ of Mandamus 1.) Application pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, United States Constitution Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Applicant as Petitioner seeks intervention for direction to the United States , District Court of Arizona, with appeal for right of “Jury Trial” pursuant to Seventh Amendment U.S. Constitution for violations of Supremacy o