No. 21-7811

Kushawn Miles-El, aka Kushawn S. Miles v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2022-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel constitutional-error constitutional-errors court-transcripts due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-appeal structural-errors transcripts
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-petitioner-s-direct-appeal-as-of-right-should-be-reinstated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED *** (CAPITAL CASE) *** I WHETHER PETITIONER S DIRECT APPEAL AS OF RIGHT SHOULD BE REINSTATED BECAUSE HIS DIRECT APPEAL WAS NOT ADJUDICATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE HIS APPELLATE ATTORNEY WAS INEFFECTIVE AND DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO PERFECT HIS APPEAL OF RIGHT WHEN APPELLATE COUNSEL FAILED TO REQUEST OBTAIN & REVIEW ALL TRANSCRIPTS & LOWER COURT RECORDS (SPECIFICALLY PETITIONERS JANUARY 28, 1994) ; WALKER HEARING TRANSCRIPT ON ATTORNEYS MOTION TO WITHORAW AS COUNSEL _ AND INVESTIGATE CONSTITUTIONAL & STRUCTURAL ERRORS CONTAINED THEREIR

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2022)

Attorneys

Kushawn Miles-El
Kushawn Miles-El — Petitioner