No. 21-7811
Kushawn Miles-El, aka Kushawn S. Miles v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel constitutional-error constitutional-errors court-transcripts due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-appeal structural-errors transcripts
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER PETITIONER S DIRECT APPEAL AS OF RIGHT SHOULD RE REINSTATED
BECAUSE HIS DIRECT APPEAL WAS NOT ADJUDICATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE HIS APPELLATE ATTORNEY WAS INEFFECTIVE AND
DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO PERFECT HIS APPEAL OF RIGHT WHEN
APPELLATE COUNSEL FAILED TO REQUEST OBTAIN & REVIEW ALL TRANSCRIPTS
& LOWER COURT RECOROS (SPECIFICALLT PETITIONERS JANUAR Y 20, 1994 )
WALKE R HEARINQ TRANSCRI PT ON ATTORNEYS MOTIO N TO WIThCRW AS COUNSEL
AN™INVESTTGATF^BliFfTYUT IWAFTT tWcTURAL ERRORS' '(MTATNED^THEfeYliI
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-petitioner-s-direct-appeal-as-of-right-should-be-reinstated
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Kushawn Miles-El
Kushawn Miles-El — Petitioner