Was the complete deprivation of Ms. Poef's fundamental rights to determine how to protect her liberty related to structural error that violated multiple provisions throughout the trial process?

No question identified. : 1. Was Hr Lomplete deprivation oF Ms. POEFS Sundamental rights 4D determine hoo +b Broted Wer i berhy related to. . Structural error violaked multiple tious Yorowoiout tre trial process? ; . | Gi) oC AL PARTIES _ Slia Ane Rote, Peifione nit Stas ve Mee ott“ (CREATED OSES The Original judgment of toavichan ta Castro, 4 IT-UR= LL OF Petitioner in Ye Unit Saks Distt Lourt Br tie —_—__Sovtinena District of Tevas voas ror reportid and is attached —___ereto_0s “Appendiw An ——_The_edigical oder of diserissal Sorte "Petition fo Writ DE Habras Corpus." ia tne United Stas District (oud Soc _Yne Soutoern bishict of Tewas Uden Case no, YiIE-tv-OuNso AS. net Veported) and is AHached farvelo AS Appel BL The Appeiiaie ocler of abenacm) iat Void Stans Pepeals Coit for tins FA Civovit Uader tase 20. 20-204) was rot | Yepordcl to Ms. Potts Krousk«cloe and is ahached hereto GS ‘ Apeencdiw Cc.” __ The “Rutition fo Rearing "WAS Olso denied hy You United Stakes Court of Appeals for the Het Gcusit ancl is attached lneveto as kependin. be. as 5) oo TAU RE ConorenS Bag Sa __UsteoemiRatics Relakd Cans a Cit) _ Stok ottinetae Reasons for @anting Ww lit Sl Summary ef Argues’ Question |= Arquencat ss Prewee wen ee 2S Cert Gicate of Compliance me oo ENDEK To APPENDICES Ex. AOrigioal Judgrunt of tonvickioa (Urals to. ger copy) _ Ex.BOrigiea Oude O€ Bisenicsa) for “PH HOO for brit of Habtas Cops” : Ex. COvdev of Af Arment fom bourt 0€ hppcals a Ex.DOrc 0€ bernie fox “Peon of Renzaving" ‘ Ex EDb. Rr Cova ology Report CO Cos Rett _ Nem v. Raia, 241 F Suppl (N.D.OWIG IMO eee eee NB — Bourn v. Johnston, 848.0092 (a3) IT . _Breden v.29 Judicial Carctot koh ious. Us4 (ams> _ Brookhartv. Janis, L$. Ch. 14S (GUL. ; Chombers v. Mississippi Y1IO US. 284 (413) ae 13 _ Corpus v. Beto, WUAE 20.985 (Sth Gy IGT), tert denied UINUSASAGTIS) eee A ___ Darrev. Burfod, 339 US. 200 eso) NG “Ey Parte Bol) man and Ex Park Suavtovt. 8 US.15 got) 20 _ Fovettay. Californio, 99 $.4. 2598 (1915). WO _—._._ Fay vs Noia., 23 S.C. B2Uas) Flordav. Niven, 125 $.4.551 (S000), Giglio v. Waited Straws, WOsu.sisoUatay) ___ Harris v. Nason, 89 6.G.108a (IAD ———Hurmany. Caudy, “IU S.Ch 223 (19s) 23 doin} Moti -Fasoist Refug ee Conan i thee v. Me rath, US.0. Lad last) __\2 _ Allan son v. Roars, GIT E 2d 1383 (loci, GO), NTR Johnson v. Zerbst, 58 S.C. 1014 (193¢), a ae 7 Jorus v. Bore, U US US.TUS (9g5), donss v. Shut), S42 F 2a 1218 (8 Cie. 118). ; 4 Wary v. Stare o€ Virainia., WA E id. lus (4ecrigtioy. .. . . . ld Mura. Deano, 14S. Ch ib Gasud a ns 2D lwaay. Bebo, ASF. 24,35 (S" Cir 1QU8 Len bar), tert dried 3440S ALLA)... TSO Marrow v. Seoth, SOT F 2d. 414 (1 Gr I, 2 we wo 1S . Nay v Stale DF Georgia. YOAF. 2.203 SG IUD, | 14 Meliellanv. Young 451 F: 2c). LAD Lute Civ.laqoy, , 6 | Metoy v. Wovisiana. , 1885-C4r. 1500 (20Ieyd= se AN A4 AS, 24, 24 _ MeKaskky. Wiggins, WuS US. ie (awa), oe 2 24 Mooney v: Holohan , 5S 6.340 ASS), 2 Moore w. Dumpsiy, 45 8.4. ous (as). Murray. Comrie, U1 US NTR GRD. 2 ee. 2S Nevadav. Jackson, SU9 US, S05 (0Isy), 2... NS O'Neal v. MCARIOCh, 513 US. HBRGASD). 2 ow LS Parra v. Taylor, (OlS.C. AOS CI9ZI)D, Ww ww we Preistr v. Rodin, 93 S.C. IGT). ee AIS Price v. doaston, 6S $.c41049 (ae). ee Por. brkansos , UBSUS.44UQ9ET). 2 2. ew 2 . Sy 2h ed Rosev. Mark , WIBUS.SIOUI). 2. ww ee 8 oS Rutoyv. United States, 3U1 Ftd. S85 (4! Gir 14US) ~,. 1G Rutherford v. Pitoness , UST F Supe. 104 (4 Cir 878), 1S Sthivpy. Do, sisus. melas), 2 es 28 Steriory bE State for Home Kefalcsv. O'Brien, GASB) A.C.UO3(4.L.),, V7 . Teague v. Maup, S53 F Sd lous (1 Cir. 2007), LS. LS Treglia». Qanen, 318 Fup. 18 (N.b.CalIa4), 2. . IG Turner Reaasyuantti, LAS. 6.1858 (949) , oe 2 ed . United Staksv. Rooker, SU3.US.230(200S). 2. 2. 62 . Lata Stats v. Brooks, US F.3d.44G (iscir 1998), 2. . ZO | _ Unittd Stars v. Byres QUA F.2d, Ile (SI? Gir. 1442) 2. . 10 Dnitta Staksv. Daenport, WSF 20.1223 (12 ir AND. 5 14 Cv) : |__Uniea Skates v. Garey, 98H.F 3c) '49 (Oi Ge. 2019). Za ai